Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Thursday, July 05, 2007
A Grievance
When citizens are impelled to demand the impeachment of the Administrative branch of their government; they should expect to name the crimes which the Administration has committed.
Our government was created to protect our inalienable rights and to govern us by consent; and if the government becomes destructive to those ends, The People have the right to abolish it and form a new government. The current Administration has no concern for the safety and happiness of The People. We have suffered complacently at the hands of tyrants who pretend to fight evil while lining their pockets with gold. We do not make our complaints lightly, but after a long series of abuses and moves towards despotism we cannot remain silent. What remains is to name but a few of the facts of our case.
• The President has used signing statements to make more than 500 constitutional challenges and has defied over 800 federal laws.
• The President has opposed judge and jury by commuting the felony sentence of a duly convicted member of his administration.
• The President and Vice President have refused to comply with subpoenas issued by Congress.
• The President and Vice President have interfered with the tenure of judicial officials.
• The President and Vice President have caused investigations of their political allies to be abandoned.
• Their Administration is responsible for revealing the identity of a secret government agent thereby risking our national security.
• The President and Vice President have expanded the bureaucracy with new departments and czars and have sent their agents into our homes without warrant.
• The President and Vice President have used the threat of martial law to maintain their independence and superiority to the other branches of government and the civil power.
• The President and Vice President have revoked our right of habeas corpus.
• The President and Vice President maintain foreign prisons where we are tried for made-up offences under pretend laws.
• The President and Vice President have invaded a sovereign nation based on false intelligence.
• The President and Vice President have used their position to funnel war profits to their business associates by awarding contracts outside the bidding process.
At every corrupt milestone we have petitioned for redress only to reach greater corruption.
We have spoken to Congress in the clearest and strongest terms and have been met with deaf ears and weak hands. We expect our Congress to respond to the civil power.
Therefore, we The People demand that Congress impeach the President and Vice President and remove them from office for violating the laws and trust of The People of the United States of America.
Our government was created to protect our inalienable rights and to govern us by consent; and if the government becomes destructive to those ends, The People have the right to abolish it and form a new government. The current Administration has no concern for the safety and happiness of The People. We have suffered complacently at the hands of tyrants who pretend to fight evil while lining their pockets with gold. We do not make our complaints lightly, but after a long series of abuses and moves towards despotism we cannot remain silent. What remains is to name but a few of the facts of our case.
• The President has used signing statements to make more than 500 constitutional challenges and has defied over 800 federal laws.
• The President has opposed judge and jury by commuting the felony sentence of a duly convicted member of his administration.
• The President and Vice President have refused to comply with subpoenas issued by Congress.
• The President and Vice President have interfered with the tenure of judicial officials.
• The President and Vice President have caused investigations of their political allies to be abandoned.
• Their Administration is responsible for revealing the identity of a secret government agent thereby risking our national security.
• The President and Vice President have expanded the bureaucracy with new departments and czars and have sent their agents into our homes without warrant.
• The President and Vice President have used the threat of martial law to maintain their independence and superiority to the other branches of government and the civil power.
• The President and Vice President have revoked our right of habeas corpus.
• The President and Vice President maintain foreign prisons where we are tried for made-up offences under pretend laws.
• The President and Vice President have invaded a sovereign nation based on false intelligence.
• The President and Vice President have used their position to funnel war profits to their business associates by awarding contracts outside the bidding process.
At every corrupt milestone we have petitioned for redress only to reach greater corruption.
We have spoken to Congress in the clearest and strongest terms and have been met with deaf ears and weak hands. We expect our Congress to respond to the civil power.
Therefore, we The People demand that Congress impeach the President and Vice President and remove them from office for violating the laws and trust of The People of the United States of America.
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Founding Fanatics
You hear a lot these days about returning to the ideals of our founding fathers. What most people refuse to think about is that these founders were for the most part religious zealots who instead of escaping persecution at home merely exported it to the new world. The Maryland Act concerning Religion (1649) regulated death, imprisonment, confiscation of property and public whipping for dissing the lord or any of his agents. Freedom of religion was protected for believers of Jesus Christ except:
This was just Maryland; settled by Roman Catholics.
New England was settled by Puritans; Virginia by Anglicans. Roger Williams founded Rhode Island on religious freedom, as did William Penn’s “Society of Friends” in Pennsylvania. Lutherans and Jews were encouraged to settle in these areas. These various groups were not at all friendly with each other as the Maryland example shows.
…heritick, Scismatick, Idolator, puritan, Independant, Prespiterian popish
prest, Jesuite, Jesuited papist, Lutheran, Calvenist, Anabaptist, Brownist,
Antinomian, Barrowist, Roundhead, or Sepatist…
This was just Maryland; settled by Roman Catholics.
New England was settled by Puritans; Virginia by Anglicans. Roger Williams founded Rhode Island on religious freedom, as did William Penn’s “Society of Friends” in Pennsylvania. Lutherans and Jews were encouraged to settle in these areas. These various groups were not at all friendly with each other as the Maryland example shows.
Sunday, April 23, 2006
Shhh.... Don't Tell But, Rumsfeld Must Go.
Donald Rumsfeld should have retired a year ago when Bush rejected his resignation. Rumsfeld intimidated senior military officers like General Eric Shinseki, who in early 2003 told Congress it would take 300,000 troops to garrison Iraq safely. Rumsfeld fired him while no one except Army Secretary Thomas White came to his defense. Rumsfeld fired White too. Now some retired officers regret not speaking out earlier and confronting Rumsfeld’s mistakes. Rumsfeld is hard to work with and a poisonous atmosphere has developed at the Pentagon. This culture of dissatisfaction has created two different stories: one official story where all is going according to plan and another, candid story told to friends and relatives that is more pessimistic. Unfortunately, the paranoia growing amongst the senior military ranks is quelling even these candid opinions. A Secretary of Defense under so much fire cannot do his job.
From the very beginning, Rumsfeld challenged his military advisors by reducing troop numbers and by not working to keep the Baathist dominated army, (except the senior officer corps,) intact. Now there are less than half the recommended troops, and no Iraqi army whatsoever. Some might argue that the Iraqi army had already disintegrated by the time the provisional authority officially disbanded it but I will bet if they offered $200 a head, they could have rebuilt a majority of it in 2 months or less.
Rumsfeld, as well as Wolfowitz, were concerned that the public would not support a war and reconstruction that cost as much as the estimates suggested. Rumsfeld reduced troop numbers while Wolfowitz engaged in fantasy economics suggesting that Iraqi oil reserves would more than pay the estimate reconstruction costs of $1.5 billion. Wolfowitz ignored analysis that suggested it would be years before Iraqi oil production would return to pre-war levels, let alone pay for reconstruction. The cost so far is over $200 billion and the oil fields remain idle.
From the very beginning, Rumsfeld challenged his military advisors by reducing troop numbers and by not working to keep the Baathist dominated army, (except the senior officer corps,) intact. Now there are less than half the recommended troops, and no Iraqi army whatsoever. Some might argue that the Iraqi army had already disintegrated by the time the provisional authority officially disbanded it but I will bet if they offered $200 a head, they could have rebuilt a majority of it in 2 months or less.
Rumsfeld, as well as Wolfowitz, were concerned that the public would not support a war and reconstruction that cost as much as the estimates suggested. Rumsfeld reduced troop numbers while Wolfowitz engaged in fantasy economics suggesting that Iraqi oil reserves would more than pay the estimate reconstruction costs of $1.5 billion. Wolfowitz ignored analysis that suggested it would be years before Iraqi oil production would return to pre-war levels, let alone pay for reconstruction. The cost so far is over $200 billion and the oil fields remain idle.
Sunday, April 09, 2006
Spokane's River Park Garage Accident
I am not a construction engineer but the collapse of a retaining wall on the fifth floor of Spokane's River Park Square parking garage smells like shoddy construction to me. On Saturday, April 8, 2006, Jo Savage managed to drive her Subaru though a 5-inch thick section of wall and plunge to her death. The photo in the Spokesman Review shows a five-foot section of preformed concrete broken and hanging from rebar. What seems odd to me is that there was no damage to the sides of the dislodged piece as if there were no interconnections between the panels. By failing to connect the wall together the retaining strength is reduced dramatically with disastrous results. Ms. Savage should have spun her wheels to the rims instead breaking through a ‘retaining wall’.
Sunday, March 26, 2006
An Unhealthy Quest for Perfection
I worry that everyone thinks I'm lazy and always making mistakes. I'm not, I know, but still I worry. The work I do is praised by my customers and supervisors, and yet they frighten me, why?
Away from work I am confronted by the real world which is deteriorating into some strange Cyber-McCarthyist "Fear Factor" camp. The Feds now want to look at our web browsing and see if we fit a deviant lifestyle suitable for harassment, imprisonment, and deniable torture.
One by one I defend my rights as a citizen!
1. I defend my right to practice my religion, free from any government standards, or faith-based legislative guidelines. My religion shall never be corrupted by any government. I say what I want, when I want, about what I want, and I defend the same rights for my neighbor, and I fight the government if they try to abridging these rights. I hang out with who I choose and discuss our government’s mistakes and pursue my representatives for answers and remedies to our grievances. Such behavior should label me a civic leader, not a radical.
2. I defend my right to own a gun, not just to repel foreign invaders, but also to defend myself, my family, and my friends from a government that no longer supports these rights.
3. I shall not quarter any soldiers who do not support all the rights listed here.
4. I shall not allow mine nor my neighbor’s house to be searched without warrant and a description of what they expect to find.
5. I reserve the right to bear witness; I will not be a ‘Nark’.
6. I will demand to confront my accuser and have a speedy trial if legal action is brought against me.
7. I will defend my right to have legal disputes decided by a jury of my peers.
8. I shall defend against unreasonable legal fines and punishments.
9. There are vast multitudes of other rights I retain and will defend for others.
10. In the end, rights belong to people, not governments, and we retain them.
I don’t think these are radical notions, and I don’t think the Bush administration should treat us like a bunch of suspects.
Away from work I am confronted by the real world which is deteriorating into some strange Cyber-McCarthyist "Fear Factor" camp. The Feds now want to look at our web browsing and see if we fit a deviant lifestyle suitable for harassment, imprisonment, and deniable torture.
One by one I defend my rights as a citizen!
1. I defend my right to practice my religion, free from any government standards, or faith-based legislative guidelines. My religion shall never be corrupted by any government. I say what I want, when I want, about what I want, and I defend the same rights for my neighbor, and I fight the government if they try to abridging these rights. I hang out with who I choose and discuss our government’s mistakes and pursue my representatives for answers and remedies to our grievances. Such behavior should label me a civic leader, not a radical.
2. I defend my right to own a gun, not just to repel foreign invaders, but also to defend myself, my family, and my friends from a government that no longer supports these rights.
3. I shall not quarter any soldiers who do not support all the rights listed here.
4. I shall not allow mine nor my neighbor’s house to be searched without warrant and a description of what they expect to find.
5. I reserve the right to bear witness; I will not be a ‘Nark’.
6. I will demand to confront my accuser and have a speedy trial if legal action is brought against me.
7. I will defend my right to have legal disputes decided by a jury of my peers.
8. I shall defend against unreasonable legal fines and punishments.
9. There are vast multitudes of other rights I retain and will defend for others.
10. In the end, rights belong to people, not governments, and we retain them.
I don’t think these are radical notions, and I don’t think the Bush administration should treat us like a bunch of suspects.
Friday, March 17, 2006
...And Out the Other
I don't wanna do my laundry. I don't wanna do my laundry. Why don't you do it for me. Baby, baby, baby, baby please.
Thanks to Pepper for starting me on this blog thing.
Thanks to Pepper for starting me on this blog thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)